Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Spell"
From BatWiki
BlackSmith (Talk | contribs) m (layout) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | = Todo = | + | == Todo == |
| − | Some better way to categorise spell according to "Type of spell:". | + | * Some better way to categorise spell according to "Type of spell:". |
| − | + | * Find a fix to get links to spells work e.g. template/plugin replacing spaces with _'s. | |
| − | Find a | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | == Some thoughts == | ||
| + | * The whole concept of having another page in addition to category:spell is still questionable. Why couldn't you just have put the same info in the category page? But since you've already in good way of doing these... | ||
| + | * The "To list of Mirror image" sounds silly, i'd suggest something in the lines of "For the list of articles involving Mirror image, see: Category:Mirror image" or something like that. | ||
| + | * The categories are questionable as well. "Neutral spell" is fine I guess, since it doesn't yet exist in other forms, but those "Affecting stat int" and "Cast type protection" could've as well point to the already existing category:int and category:cast protection. | ||
--[[User:Nuane|Nuane]] | --[[User:Nuane|Nuane]] | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 7 September 2008
Todo
- Some better way to categorise spell according to "Type of spell:".
- Find a fix to get links to spells work e.g. template/plugin replacing spaces with _'s.
Some thoughts
- The whole concept of having another page in addition to category:spell is still questionable. Why couldn't you just have put the same info in the category page? But since you've already in good way of doing these...
- The "To list of Mirror image" sounds silly, i'd suggest something in the lines of "For the list of articles involving Mirror image, see: Category:Mirror image" or something like that.
- The categories are questionable as well. "Neutral spell" is fine I guess, since it doesn't yet exist in other forms, but those "Affecting stat int" and "Cast type protection" could've as well point to the already existing category:int and category:cast protection.
--Nuane
