Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Spell"
BlackSmith (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Find a work around to get links to spells work e.g. template/plugin replacing spaces with _'s. [[User:BlackSmith|BlackSmith]] 02:10, 5 July 2008 (EEST) | Find a work around to get links to spells work e.g. template/plugin replacing spaces with _'s. [[User:BlackSmith|BlackSmith]] 02:10, 5 July 2008 (EEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Some thoughts: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - The whole concept of having another page in addition to category:spell is still questionable. Why couldn't you just have put the same info in the category page? But since you've already in good way of doing these... | ||
| + | |||
| + | - The "To list of Mirror image" sounds silly, i'd suggest something in the lines of "For the list of articles involving Mirror image, see: Category:Mirror image" or something like that. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - The categories are questionable as well. "Neutral spell" is fine I guess, since it doesn't yet exist in other forms, but those "Affecting stat int" and "Cast type protection" could've as well point to the already existing category:int and category:cast protection. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Nuane|Nuane]] | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 31 August 2008
Todo
Some better way to categorise spell according to "Type of spell:". BlackSmith 01:50, 5 July 2008 (EEST)
Find a work around to get links to spells work e.g. template/plugin replacing spaces with _'s. BlackSmith 02:10, 5 July 2008 (EEST)
Some thoughts:
- The whole concept of having another page in addition to category:spell is still questionable. Why couldn't you just have put the same info in the category page? But since you've already in good way of doing these...
- The "To list of Mirror image" sounds silly, i'd suggest something in the lines of "For the list of articles involving Mirror image, see: Category:Mirror image" or something like that.
- The categories are questionable as well. "Neutral spell" is fine I guess, since it doesn't yet exist in other forms, but those "Affecting stat int" and "Cast type protection" could've as well point to the already existing category:int and category:cast protection.
--Nuane
