Talk:Races

I'll see when I have time if I can get this to format more nicely.

Would be grand. I don't know enough wiki to make the last collum un-warped so it gets crammed all to page width if its without fixed width. BlackSmith 02:18, 13 August 2007 (EEST)

---

Erm, with 1280 x 1024 page looks rather nasty, have to scroll horizontally, how about splitting information to 2 or more pages or changing font to something really small. --Dreadlord 01:54, 14 August 2007 (EEST)

What info would you put to other page? All the data is relevant if not critical. They were originally in 2 rows per race but that is not possible if you want to be able to sort the data and IMO usability > pretty. I use it with my 1680x1050 by sorting them first and the nscrolling horizintally to see the abilitys the race has, or vice versa. If the sorting would work with col/rowspan, it could be made lot preattier but alas, it fucks up sorting and that was the main point i remade the whole chart. BlackSmith 19:42, 14 August 2007 (EEST)

Otherwise good argument but unfortunately not everyone has 1680x1050 or even signator's 1280x1024. And by word 'nasty' I did not mean exactly 'unaesthetatic', my bad there, you see horizontal scrolling in this article makes so-called 'usability' a very vague definition especially with lower screen resolutions. Perhaps smaller font and more dense columns would do the trick. --Dreadlord 14:38, 16 August 2007 (EEST)

Err, my point was that even with high resos you need to scroll it. We can force the rows to be thin or table as whole to be slim, but that either means fat table or damn long table. How does it look now with colors used instead of rebirth collum? BlackSmith 19:38, 22 August 2007 (EEST)